🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to enact a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the local level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.